Abstract Nonsense

Crushing one theorem at a time

The Exponential and Trigonometric Functions (Pt. II)

Point of Post: This is a continuation of this post.

\text{ }

This immediately tells us then that \exp(x+iy)=e^x(\cos(y)+i\sin(y)). This tells us quite a few thing:

\text{ }

Theorem: Let z\in\mathbb{C}. Then, |\exp(z)|=\exp(\text{Re}(z)).

\text{ }

Theorem: Let w,z\in\mathbb{C}. Then, \exp(z)=\exp(w) if and only if z-w\in2\pi i\mathbb{Z}.

Proof: Since \exp(z)=\exp(w) we have that |\exp(z)|=|\exp(w)| and so the above theorem tells us (since the exponential function on \mathbb{R} is injective) that \text{Re}(z)=\text{Re}(w). We see then that \cos(\text{Im}(z))+i\cos(\text{Im}(z))=\cos(\text{Im}(w))+i\cos(\text{Im}(w)) and thus \cos(\text{Im}(z))=\cos(\text{Im}(w)) which tells us that \text{Im}(z)-\text{Im}(w)\in 2\pi\mathbb{Z}. Thus, evidently

\text{ }

z-w=(\text{Re}(z)-\text{Re}(w))+i(\text{Im}(z)-\text{Im}(w))\in 2\pi i\mathbb{Z}

\text{ }

The converse follows similarly. \blacksquare

\text{ }

Corollary: The exponential function is periodic of period 2\pi i.

\text{ }

We also note then that we get the following cool fact:

\text{ }

Theorem: The mapping f:[0,1)\to\mathbb{S}^1 given by f(t)=\exp(2\pi i t) is a bijective continuous map.

\text{ }

Remark: This is a simple example of why in general categories aren’t balanced. Indeed, the monos and epis in \mathbf{Top} are the injective and surjective continuous maps. Thus, we see that f is a bimorphism. That said, f is not a homeomorphism (the isomorphism in \mathbf{Top}) otherwise there would exist a continuous bijection \mathbb{S}^1\to [0,1) which is not true since \mathbb{S}^1 is compact and [0,1) is not.

\text{ }

Now, based on the above analysis we define the functions \sin and \cos mapping \mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C} by

\text{ }

\displaystyle \sin(z)=\frac{\exp(iz)-\exp(-iz)}{2i}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n z^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}

\text{ }


\text{ }

\displaystyle \cos(z)=\frac{\exp(iz)+\exp(-iz)}{2}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n z^{2n}}{(2n)!}

\text{ }

Since any linear combination of entire functions is entire it follows that both \sin and \cos are entire.

\text{ }    latex \text{ }$


\text{ }

[1] Greene, Robert Everist, and Steven George Krantz. Function Theory of One Complex Variable. Providence: American Mathematical Society, 2006. Print.

[2] Conway, John B. Functions of One Complex Variable I. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978. Print.

[3] Rudin, W. Real and Complex Analysis. New York,NY: McGraw-Hill, 1988. Print.

[4]  Ahlfors, Lars V. Complex Analysis; an Introduction to the Theory of Analytic Functions of One Complex Variable. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966. Print.

May 5, 2012 - Posted by | Complex Analysis | , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 136 other followers

%d bloggers like this: