Abstract Nonsense

Crushing one theorem at a time

Finite Limits and Colimits as Products/Coproducts and Equalizers/Coequalizers

Point of Post: In this post we prove the result that a category has all finite products/coproducts and equalizers/coequalizers if and only if it has all limits/colimits.

\text{ }


\text{ }

In this post we prove a pretty neat fact that, at least for finite sets (we shall state a more general result, but we don’t care about it as much) limits/colimits are the same thing as equalizers/coequalizers and products/coproducts. This is often cool because it reduces having to prove some result holding for all finite limits/colimits to proving some problem holds for equalizers/coequalizers and finite products/coproducts. In particular, it will tell us that a category admits finite limits/colimits if and only if it admits finite products/coproducts.

\text{ }

Finite Limits/Colimits ad Products/Coproducts and Equalizers/Coequalizers

\text{ }

There is really nothing to discuss here, so I’ll just bang this one out:

\text{ }

Theorem: Every finite limit/colimit can be written as the equalizers/coequalizer of a finite product/coproduct of maps.

Proof: Let \mathcal{I} be a finite category (finite amount of objects AND finite amount of arrows) and F:\mathcal{I}\to\mathcal{C} a diagram. Consider the two arrows

\text{ }

\displaystyle \prod_{i\in\text{Obj}(\mathcal{I})}F(i)\overset{\displaystyle \overset{\Phi}{\longrightarrow}}{\underset{\Psi}{\longrightarrow}}\prod_{\alpha\in\text{Mor}(\mathcal{I}}F(\text{codomain }\alpha)

\text{ }

(where, in case you’ve forgotten, \text{Mor}(\mathcal{C}) stands for all the morphisms in \mathcal{C} and if X\xrightarrow{\alpha}Y then \text{codomain }\alpha=Y) defined projection wise by \pi_\alpha\circ\Phi=\pi_{\text{codomain }\alpha} and \pi_\alpha\circ\Psi=F(\alpha)\circ\pi_{\text{domain }\alpha} where \pi_{\text{codomain }\alpha} is  the projection arrow \displaystyle \prod_{i\in\text{Obj}(\mathcal{C}}F(i)\to F(\text{codomain }\alpha) and \pi_{\text{domain }\alpha} is defined similarly (of course you can guess what domain means here).

\text{ }

Let (E,e) be an equalizer of these two arrows. What we want to show then is that (E,\pi_i\circ e) is actually a limit for D. To prove this we need to take any possible arrow \displaystyle X\xrightarrow{\gamma}\prod_i F(i). Observe then that the set of arrows \{\pi_i\circ\gamma\} is a cone for F if and only if \Phi\circ \gamma=\Psi\circ\gamma (check this).  From this then we may conclud ethat (E,\pi_i\circ e) is a cone. Moreover, we see that any cone is going to have to factorize through (E,\pi_i\circ e) since the cone functions of that cone will have to equalize \Phi and \Psi. \blacksquare

\text{ }

Using the exact same set up (dualizing) one can prove that

\text{ }

Theorem: Every finite colimit can be written as the coequalizer of a finite coproduct.

\text{ }

Corollary: If a category admits all equalizers (resp. coequalizers) and finite products (resp. coproducts) then the category admits all finite limits (resp. colimits). 

\text{ }

Corollary: An abelian category admits all finite limits and colimits.

Proof: Recall that an abelian category, by definition, includes all kernels an cokernels. And, since \text{Equ}(f,g)=\ker(f-g) and \text{Coeq}(f,g)=\text{coker}(f-g) we also know that it admits all equalizers and coequalizers. Since abelian categories also admit all finite products and coproducts the conclusion follows. \blacksquare

\text{ }

\text{ }


[1] Mac, Lane Saunders. Categories for the Working Mathematician. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994. Print.

[2] Adámek, Jirí, Horst Herrlich, and George E. Strecker. Abstract and Concrete Categories: the Joy of Cats. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990. Print.

[3] Berrick, A. J., and M. E. Keating. Categories and Modules with K-theory in View. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP, 2000. Print.

[4] Freyd, Peter J. Abelian Categories. New York: Harper & Row, 1964. Print.

[5] Mitchell, Barry. Theory of Categories. New York: Academic, 1965. Print.

[6] Herrlich, Horst, and George E. Strecker. Category Theory: An Introduction. Lemgo: Heldermann, 2007. Print.


April 13, 2012 - Posted by | Algebra, Category Theory | , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment »

  1. […] follows from the fact that all limits (resp. colimits) can be defined as a combination of products and equalizers (resp. […]

    Pingback by Continuous and Cocontinuous Functors (Pt. II) « Abstract Nonsense | April 15, 2012 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: