## Functions of Class C^k

**Point of Post: **In this post we define the notion of classes of differentiability and discuss what the membership in some of these classes implies about the function.

*Motivation*

Since differentiability and related notions are our focus for right now, it seems prudent that we should define some kind of notation which shortens saying things like “ has partial derivatives of all types of order “, ” has partial derivatives of all types of order and each partial derivative is continuous”, or ” has partial derivatives of all orders and all types”. This is taken up by the notion of classes which, put simply tells you how well-behaved the function is.

* Classes*

Let where . We say that ( with ) if is open in and has partial derivatives of all types of order and that is continuous on for every possible . We say that if is continuous on . We often say without specifying any larger domain may be defined on. We first note the following facts:

**Theorem: ***Let , with , then is total differentiable everywhere on .*

**Proof: **This follows immediately from our previous theorem pertaining to this.

Consequently, recalling that total differentiability implies continuity we have the following corollary:

**Corollary: ***For any open we have that .*

In fact, taking this a step further it’s easy to see that

**Theorem: ***Let be open. Then,*

What we next note is that order of derivatives doesn’t really matter for functions in the following sense:

**Theorem: ***Let . Then, for every and with we have *

**Proof: **We know that by the prior theorem and thus we may use Clairaut’s theorem to make successive switches, and so the conclusion follows.

If is open we say that if for every . We call such functions s*mooth. *

We extend the notion of functions to vector valued functions in the obvious way (same definition). Or, we could alternatively say that a mapping ,where is open, is (with ) if . Clearly then the theorems from the above apply now to this extended notion.

We last note that if the domain and/or codomain of a mapping is either irrelevant or implies we are apt to just say that is .

**References:**

1. Spivak, Michael. *Calculus on Manifolds; a Modern Approach to Classical Theorems of Advanced Calculus.* New York: W.A. Benjamin, 1965. Print.

2. Apostol, Tom M. *Mathematical Analysis*. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub., 1974. Print.

[…] the sake of pedagogy let us do an actual example. Take to be the hyperboloid . Clearly then is smooth on all of . Let us then compute the tangent plane to at . In particular since and and so the […]

Pingback by The Geometry of the Derivative for Real Valued Mappings (Pt. I) « Abstract Nonsense | June 9, 2011 |

[…] of , when restricted to , make into a ring. Natural examples are sitting inside , the ring of continuously differentiable functions sitting inside , […]

Pingback by Subrings « Abstract Nonsense | June 15, 2011 |

[…] functions. Here we mention only two particular examples. Namely, we mention the ring of -times differentiable functions for an open subset and the set of holomorphic functions on some open subset […]

Pingback by Rings of Functions (Pt. II) « Abstract Nonsense | August 2, 2011 |

[…] . It’s pretty intuitive that we should replace continuously differentiable with (in the multivariable sense). Lastly, we see that seems naturally translatable to or, in the more common form, . Thus, we can […]

Pingback by The Inverse Function Theorem (Preliminaries) « Abstract Nonsense | September 12, 2011 |

[…] curve or just curve for short. A curve is called if it is -coordinate functions are in the usual sense. From this point on we assume that all curves are , or also known as […]

Pingback by Curves and the Implicit Function Theorem « Abstract Nonsense | September 15, 2011 |

[…] regular surface or just surface if it admits a topological atlas such that for every the map is smooth and the total derivative is injective for each . Such a topological atlas is called a smooth […]

Pingback by Surfaces « Abstract Nonsense | October 7, 2011 |

[…] Let be open. Suppose that is a diffeomorphism (i.e. a bijective function with inverse). If is a surface then is a […]

Pingback by Surfaces (Pt. II) « Abstract Nonsense | October 9, 2011 |

[…] since, as we shall see (and, as I’m sure you well-know), they are MUCH nicer then any kind of real differentiable function . In particular, we shall see that any once differentiable function shall be infinitely […]

Pingback by Complex Differentiability and Holomorphic Functions (Pt. I) « Abstract Nonsense | May 1, 2012 |

[…] be open. Let be a function in the real sense. Then, we define the Wirtinger’s Derivatives and as […]

Pingback by Complex Differentiable and Holmorphic Functions (Pt. III) « Abstract Nonsense | May 1, 2012 |