Abstract Nonsense

Crushing one theorem at a time

Cute Complex Analysis Problem

Problem: Let f:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C} be entire with


Then, if either |\mu(x,y)|\leqslant M or |\nu(x,y)|\leqslant N for some M,N\in\mathbb{R} we have that f is constant.

Proof: Evidently we must find some way to employ Liouville’s theorem, but how? It may seem hard at first to do this, but in fact the reason the problem is “cute” is because it has a “cute” solution (surprisingly simple). To do this we note that if f(z) is entire then so is e^{f(z)}. But, note that


But, remembering that

\displaystyle e^{z}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{z^n}{n!}

and for finite N

\displaystyle \left|\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{z^n}{n!}\right|\leqslant\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left|\frac{z^n}{n!}\right|=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{|z|^n}{n!}

And thus, by limiting process it follows that

\displaystyle e^z=\lim_{N\to\infty}\left|\sum_{n=0}^{N}\frac{z^n}{n!}\right|\leqslant\lim_{N\to\infty}\sum_{n=0}^{N}\frac{|z|^n}{n!}=e^{|z|}

And thus,

\left|e^{f(z)}\right|=\left|e^{\mu(x,y)}\right|\leqslant e^{|\mu(x,y)|}\leqslant e^M

And thus it follows by Liouville’s theorem that e^{f(z)} is constant, but this is only possible if f(z) is constant.

Now, suppose that \left|\nu(x,y)\right|\leqslant N, then we merely note that

\displaystyle \frac{f(z)}{i}=\nu(x,y)-\mu(x,y)i

and applying the exact same logic as in the previous part we may conclude that \displaystyle \frac{f(z)}{i}=z_0 for some z_0\in\mathbb{C}. Thus, f(z)=iz_0. \blacksquare


June 9, 2010 - Posted by | Analysis, Fun Problems, Uncategorized

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: